As a veteran teacher of forty years in the classroom, let me be clear, teachers are not completely at fault for becoming irrelevant in their profession. It results from a system that doesn’t prioritize Professional Development for its teachers. It is a system developed in the eighteenth century that devised a way to teach its teachers and the model has been carried on ever since.
At this point in this post, I imagine most educators are “screen screaming” in rage against the idiot who posted it. Then there are some teachers thinking that the post is addressing all those other educators in other districts. If you are still with me on this, I would ask you to consider what I am about to say and self-reflect, considering your own personal educator experiences as they apply to my observations.
I have had a considerable social media presence in education for over a decade. These connections have afforded me relationships with thousands of educators all over the world, but mainly in the USA. This has given me a perspective on many common practices in Professional Development for teachers. One common bond with teachers is their discontent with professional development. Many have experienced large group PD that they were required to attend that did not address their personal needs. Some teachers have had to pay not only for their own PD but they had to absorb having to pay for their own substitute. Most of the PD curriculum is delivered by instructors who lack experience with Andrgogy, adult learning. The biggest complaint is that there is no time provided to teachers for PD. There is also little, if any, follow-up to assess the impact of the PD on learning. There are still a great many schools that do not follow through with a coaching staff directly responsible for aiding teachers in newly learned skills and applications. The list goes on. They didn’t consider these practices in the eighteenth century, so why change things now?
Now in 2025 in the 21st Century, we are faced with a new challenge: Rapidly changing and evolving technology at a rate never encountered before. Most tech from the eighteenth Century until now was long in developing. It was okay to slowly adjust and teach accordingly. “That’s how I learned, so it’s good enough to teach that way” is something we can’t say today and be taken seriously. AI has changed that forever.
Here is the important part: Kids are not digital natives. There is no such thing. It was a term that people uncomfortable with tech made up to feel better about their tech skills when compared to many kids. Yes, kids are comfortable on a computer. They use it to learn things that they like. They are not teaching themselves what they need. They are social media savvy. They download and store music and movies and follow blogs and podcasts. Most don’t go beyond that. They don’t explore the ethics and responsibility of computer use. They don’t understand the real educational uses of Artificial Intelligence and the whole idea of what critical thinking is and how to apply it to their lives. This is where an, educated, understanding and aware educator is needed.
The big obvious problem here, the elephant in the classroom is that many teachers lack the education understanding and awareness that is needed for a 21st Century educator. Here is the important point that must be made: It is not the fault of the educator. AI was not any part of education when these educators went to school. So, if a majority of the teachers in our country’s school system have not been educated in the use, ethics, or impact of what will become a primary teaching tool that will be carried into every aspect of our students’ lives in a world in which they will live, we need to fix it? How do we fix that? Essential, effective, and supported Professional Development that is provided for with both money and time. It must be part of a teacher’s work week and supported by a well-trained coaching staff.
Please make no mistake, AI is going nowhere but more and more embedded in all we do. This is the problem we have in a technology-based culture. Too many teachers are wasting time talking about whether or not AI belongs in school. Of course it does! It’s a tool that workers will need to have the right skills for in order to have more choices in jobs.
Let us stop talking about kids cheating at what they do. We put them in that position. If you feel they will cheat on their homework with AI, stop giving homework. Have them work with you in class developing brainstorming, critical thinking, refinement and a dozen other skills using AI. Model what you do in class in your personal use of AI. In order to do that teachers need an understanding of AI to see how it applies to their subject and their everyday tasks. If they don’t I am sure their students will on their own. If a teacher is irrelevant and not meeting the needs of the student, the kid can learn on his or her own. Left to their own devices however, the outcome could be akin to that of what we now have with social media. That could be disasterous.
This is not to say that we can’t teach the basics of what we need to teach. An understanding of PD has become essential in education. It does mean that the job will become more labor intensive in an already stressed environment. It is up to administrators to recognize this and adjust accordingly with time support and money. If better PD is to work it won’t work without major changes. The first thing is to make it something of value for teachers and not mandated BS to check-off-the-box with a provided lecture. Develop a PD program with faculty and education experts. Be careful! We have too many AI experts for a tool that has only been here for about three years.
If teachers are irrelevant it is mostly the fault of the districts. They are being required to teach with tools that were not available in their own education. That is where valuable professional Development pays off. We can change things for the 21st Century and benefit from all it has to offer. It is way more than they had back in the eighteenth Century. If we are to better educate our kids, we need first to better educate their educators.
























