I have been very fortunate to travel both nationally and internationally to attend education conferences. A primary benefit of this is having great conversations with various types of educators. With so many of these conversations taking place on a regular basis, I find myself often depending on an opening question that resides on a short list of questions in my head. I have teacher questions, principal questions, and superintendent questions. Most of these questions are geared to being connected. Unfortunately, too often I need to first define what being connected means.
Since I have become so immersed in the concept of connectedness through social media, I too often forget that not every educator gets it yet. It has only taken me a decade to understand that. I have trouble understanding why so many educators are still clueless about the need for collaboration and its link to social media and technology? Of course, as a former teacher, I, rightly or wrongly, hold administrators to a higher standard, believing leaders should lead. My need to hold admins more accountable led me to ask (out of ignorance) in a recent Edchat, ” Why are there no standards for administrators?” Someone immediately provided: Accomplished Principal Standards from the National Board Certification for Educational Leaders First Edition National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 1525 Wilson Boulevard l Arlington, VA 22209 USA www.nbpts.org. I finally had an official document to tell me what is truly expected of school principals in order to be considered “Accomplished”. Of course that is not to say that all principals are accomplished, but it is at the very least a goal.
As I perused the extensive document, I came to the section IX. Reflection and Growth. It was an affirmation of my doubts about principals who are not connected being, or at the very least becoming increasingly irrelevant in the 21st Century model of education. Extending this out in my own head, if it applied to principals, it surely applied to superintendents as well. Here is the passage that most caught my attention:
Accomplished principals use technology as a powerful learning tool. They may participate in digital networks for communication among professional colleagues, use social networking tools for informal learning, or take part with professional colleagues in online learning communities. These principals use such learning opportunities to consistently reflect on ways to improve their practice of leadership.
This now provided a much better and focused set of questions that I could expect administrators to have an understanding.
Here is my new list of admin questions:
1 Do you consider yourself an accomplished administrator?
2 What digital networks do you use for your communication with professional colleagues?
3 What social networking tools do you employ for your informal learning?
4 In what ways are you using these connected opportunities to reflect and improve your practice?
5 How has technology impacted your learning?
Of course I am a retired teacher, author, and Blogger, so I can ask these questions with impunity. I risk nothing posing these questions to administrators. Working educators do not have that luxury. There could be grave consequences if they posed these same questions to their administrators. How do we hold administrators responsible for meeting standards posed by their own professional organizations to maintain what should be expected of any 21st Century administrator? Are these standards only for good public relations, or are they really what should be expected or better yet demanded of every administrator?
I have always said that to better educate our kids we need to first better educate their educators. I think I should also now say that, if we are to hold our teachers to higher standards as 21st Century educators, we need to first align their leaders to those same standards. Feel free to print this out and place it in an administrator’s mailbox if they are not an administrator who would view this online as “Accomplished Principals Standards” suggest.
My Island View 
I worked in corporate and education. In the corporate world, we would not have to hide our identity when bringing up issues with our superiors.
Thanks Tom for alerting me to these standards. As a principal, I’ve only referenced the Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISSLC) policy standards, which have been recently updated and have been around “forever”. I do not see any mention about connected learning in the ISSLC standards.
I also found a paragraph in the NBCEL description of Standard 1: Leadership for Results, which seems relevant to your post here:
“Accomplished principals recognize students as digital learners, with an unprecedented ability to access, acquire, and integrate information. Because technology is instrumental in bringing the world to the learner, these principals make it a priority to acquire and use state-of-the-art technologies to increase interconnectivity in the organization. They find ways to facilitate communication in the learning community and the world at large through multiple forms of media.”
There used to be a master certification program related to National Board for principals in Wisconsin, but it went away due to lack of participation.
I like the questions you pose. I’m facilitating a session for administrators at IPDX in February on how to build a PLN. Mind if I reference them, Tom?
[…] Of course, as a former teacher, I, rightly or wrongly, hold administrators to a higher standard, believing leaders should lead. My need to hold admins more accountable led me to ask (out of ignorance) in a recent Edchat, ” Why are there no standards for administrators?” Someone immediately provided: Accomplished Principal Standards from the National Board Certification for Educational Leaders First Edition National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 1525 Wilson Boulevard l Arlington, VA 22209 USA http://www.nbpts.org. I finally had an official document to tell me what is truly expected of school principals in order to be considered “Accomplished”. Of course that is not to say that all principals are accomplished, but it is at the very least a goal. […]
[…] Accomplished principals use technology as a powerful learning tool. They may participate in digital networks for communication among professional colleagues, use social networking tools for informal learning, or take part with professional colleagues in online learning communities. These principals use such learning opportunities to consistently reflect on ways to improve their practice of leadership. – Accomplished Principal Standards from the National Board Certification for Educational Leaders First Edition National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 1525 Wilson Boulevard l Arlington, VA 22209 […]
[…] Accomplished principals use technology as a powerful learning tool. They may participate in digital networks for communication among professional colleagues, use social networking tools for informal learning, or take part with professional colleagues in online learning communities. These principals use such learning opportunities to consistently reflect on ways to improve their practice of leadership. – Accomplished Principal Standards from the National Board Certification for Educational Leaders First Edition National Board for Professional Teaching Standards 1525 Wilson Boulevard l Arlington, VA 22209 […]
First of all, Thanks Tom!! This is a great resource you have provided.
One struggle for me this year has been being able to get principal buy-in with Technology. I am not quite sure how to use this yet, but it will definitely assist in my mission to bring my district into the 21s Century as best as I can.
[…] Tom Whitby: […]
[…] Source: What’s an Accomplished Administrator? […]
From what I see in my world as a superintendent, the lack of connectedness through social media sheds light on a larger issue … a lack of any compelling vision for learning of all learners…children and adults. Edleaders that don’t engage in this way still hold a stale view of learning that embraces content memorization and trivia-contest-like assessments. If you don’t believe that learning is socially embedded and open-walled you won’t practice it yourself or advocate for it in the lives of learners. Makes me wonder how the disconnected are learning and if any of it is impacting practice. I enjoyed thinking about this post!