This is a topic I have written about before, and I will probably continue to write about in the future. I guess we should start by defining a big education conference. For the purpose of this post and my experience let’s make it conferences of over 1,000 attendees. Most big education conferences came about by professional organizations wanting to provide a gathering place for their constituents to meet and share ideas and best practices, as well as the latest tools for learning. The goal is to best educate educators about education. It seems like a simple goal, which should be easily accomplished. The easiest method of delivery is to have teachers teach other teachers. This shares experiences, successes and failures.
The first hurdle is the “when” of the conference. Someone determined that it must be held during the school year in order to get the best access to the most educators.
The conference can’t conflict with other big Education conferences. It would be a drain on the number of attendees, as well as a smaller pool of keynotes and key presenters to draw on.
The second hurdle is the “where” of the conference. Once a conference gets over a certain number of attendees there are limits to access to hotel accommodations. There is also the geographical deterrent. We live in big states in a big country. Whatever the location selected, some educators will need to travel further than others. To be equitable locations are often rotated in order to share the burden of travel. Unfortunately, some educators live in areas where the burden of travel will always be a consideration no matter where the location.
The third big hurdle of the big conference is planning. Most organizations planning the big events have some full-time staff, but they mostly rely on volunteer help to plan the big events. These volunteers are also full-time educators. Some organizations employ professional planning organizations to plan the event. Many of those planning organizations begin to determine the needs and direction of the event with less consideration to the culture of the organization. The event becomes the focus and not the organization.
The fourth big hurdle is the overall expense. The planning organization, the venue, and the need for a transportation system to and from the event all contribute to the overall expenses and ultimate ticket price of the event. To offset these expenses Education and Technology industry is often asked for contributions in the form of sponsorships. With great sponsorships there sometimes comes influence in the conference. Not every session is conducted by an educator. Often there are vendor sessions. Some are informative and objective, while others are blatant product pitches.
The planning of the vendor floor is also a hurdle. It is a great source of revenue, so it must have a prominent part in the conference. Sessions are planned around access to the vendor floor. The organization and support of the vendor floor is a priority at most conferences. Technology and scheduling are the biggest considerations for this segment. The vendor floor is the conference bread and butter.
Of course the heart and soul of any conference is the session planning. The printing of the program has a very big influence over submitting, approving and scheduling sessions. It creates the deadlines for the Requests For Proposals often ten months to a year before the next conference. Once RFP’s are approved, rooms need to be assigned in consideration of anticipated attendance to the session. Times need to be adjusted to address the length of the sessions. Signage must be made up.
These conferences are not just thrown together, but meticulously planned. We need to give more thanks and recognition to those who take this on every year.
The complexity of this endeavor however, tends to shift the focus from the original goal of way back when to that of a new goal. Somehow we got from “how to best educate educators about education”, to “how to best deliver a conference”.
Of course this does not apply in total to any conference, but every conference shares some responsibility for going at least a little astray from the original goal. It must be about the learning and not just the conference.
It would be great for educators to have a list of expectations for a session before they write their RFP. Having the rubrics used for assessing the RFP is also a winning strategy. It is most important to provide feedback to the rejected RFP’s so that educators have an understanding of why they were rejected. We do that as educators working with kid learners, why would we not apply the same method to adult learners.
We realize and appreciate the need to meet a printing schedule for session descriptions, but would it be possible to stagger RFP submissions, so they were not all submitted a year before the conference. How is a year-old plan relevant in a technology driven society?
If we as educators recognize that lecture and direct instruction are not the most effective methods of learning, should we not expect conferences to rely on those types of sessions less? Maybe more interactive sessions, more conversation driven sessions, more panel discussions weighed more heavily with audience questioning would all reach that goal of learning more effectively at a conference
In light of the Edcamp model of PD, as well as the connected PD of the personal Learning Network, maybe the big conferences need to seek more relevance. We need to understand all that goes into planning and executing a big conference, but conferences may need to reassess their goals. Educators need to learn more about their ever-changing profession in the most efficient, effective and relevant ways possible. That will take a number of methods to accomplish. None of it can be done at a conference unless it is efficient, effective and relevant. We need better ways to share what we learn from conferences. More live streaming and hashtags might be a strategy.
Conferences are much-needed for educators, but if we add up all the attendees at all the conferences for an entire year, it is a very small percentage of the total number of educators in schools. Sharing and collaboration need to be a focus for attaining the goals that we have set. We need to better educate our educators in order to better educate our kids.
These are great thoughts Tom. I’m sorry that I missed you at ASCD but I heard great things about your workshop. Having just come from the conference, I am on a bit of a “high” having met so many people and listened to so many giants in the industry… but boy, is it expensive! I feel so fortunate that I was able to attend. Nevertheless, I have felt the same kind of passion and excitement after attending an EdCamp. I hope to see you soon! Don
[…] By tomwhitby […]
I was really pleased with the RFP reading process for International TESOL’s conference. We received a detailed rubric and practice proposals for orienting and norming readers, and comments were required for every submission regardless of your recommendation.
And we need to tell presenters to not show any YouTube videos or TED talks. We can watch these at home, and we have probably seen them already. Involve us and talk to us.
I would love to see more conferences doing Pre-conference type workshops during the conference. Why must I go early to spend the day on one topic of interest? Involve me and let me produce something that I can take back and use the next week.
[…] This is a topic I have written about before, and I will probably continue to write about in the future. I guess we should start by defining a big education conference. For the purpose of this post … […]
Good points, Tom. The ELearning Guild conquers that with the back channel of tweets. David Kelly is the master of sharing conference info via curation.
[…] This is a topic I have written about before, and I will probably continue to write about in the future. I guess we should start by defining a big education conference. For the purpose of this post and my experience let's make it … […]
“…more interactive sessions, more conversation driven sessions, more panel discussions weighed more heavily with audience questioning would all reach that goal of learning more effectively at a conference,” I completely agree with this statement. Driving home from CUE today I was energized, but lingered a bit on some of the low points, such as when I sat in a presentation where the PPT was awkwardly read to the audience. When I casually polled the 20+ teachers that accompanied me from my district, they gave a 50:50 rating overall. We all felt this was a great conference, but reflecting 50% could be improved.
One idea I had was if presenters had to submit a 1-2 minute commercial with their formal presentation for review. They could be posted on YouTube. They might help the conference selection committee screen a bit more easily, and they could be available for attendees to review before selecting their itineraries. We might get those odds up to 75% success. Just saying…. Thank you for your thoughtfulness.
Thanks for this post! This is something I have been contemplating myself. Sit and get PD is in face a pet peeve of mine. I don’t know what the answer is but there do seem to be an enormous number of conferences in education. I do agree that there are not enough classroom teachers that attend. And the purposes of these conferences are not always clear. I’m also an EdCamp organizer and a big fan of this style of learning. I’m very interested in “hacking” PD and shaking things up for teachers. The bottom line is always to student learning. If it never makes it that far, we aren’t doing our job. We can’t expect change until we model it, even at the giant, over-planned, over-attended education conferences.